Over the last few years, I have been increasingly wary of and
doubtful about the motives of all women who wanted to have sex with me.
There has been plenty of evidence to support this wariness. One woman,
who I had not met prior to our brief discussion, without any apparent
self-consciousness, proposed to have a child with me as soon as she
heard the street on which I lived, a street with many expensive large
houses overlooking a large body of water. When with another woman, after
we had come back to my expensive house, which has several acres of
gardens, just after our first date, and immediately after laying eyes on
my property, she proposed that she would be my girlfriend. There had
been no prior mention of any relationship, let alone sex.
To be seen by women as super-attractive and desirable just because I
have significant financial resources disgusts me. It is objectification
pure and simple. The last I heard, most women were strongly opposed to
objectification, but their behavior shows that’s a lie. When I was not
so well off, many women wouldn’t even give me the time of day. As I see
it, American women are increasingly mercenary, or perhaps just
significantly more willing to show their long-standing gold-digger
inclinations. Some are even proud of what I am coming to appreciate is
the intention to commit extortion.
I remember sitting in a restaurant at the Atlanta Airport, waiting
for my connecting flight, and overhearing three middle-aged women
talking at the next table. They made no effort to prevent those nearby
from hearing them. They were all divorcees, and they were comparing how
much loot they had extracted from their ex-husbands, as though it was a
competition. They squealed with glee about the significant resources
that they had gotten from their former mates. Nowhere in the discussion
amongst these three was there any consideration of any adverse impact on
those men. I was then shocked and dismayed that so many American women
had become so blatantly money-hungry, heartless, and manipulative. Now I
take it for granted.
More recently I have come to appreciate that Feminism has
successfully changed American laws to establish the legalized extortion
from heterosexual men, or at least from those men who are willing to
have sex with a woman, and from those men who are still sufficiently
reckless and clueless to marry an American woman. Yes, extortion
technically is a crime, but through children and/or marriage, women can,
and many do, legally engage in it. Consider the elements of the crime
as defined by common law. Extortion is the: (1) present use of threat or
force (2) of a future harm (3) to obtain money or resources (4) from
another (5) with the intent to steal. We will take each of these five
elements in turn, but I invite you, if you are an American, to consider
the women in your life, and whether they too are engaged in some form of
legalized extortion from men.
Regarding the use of (1) threat or force, consider false rape
accusations. Without evidence or justification, a woman can
unilaterally, and without any supporting evidence, have a man thrown in
jail, can cause him to lose his job, and can cause him to lose his
community reputation. Often used in retaliation for some perceived
slight, such false rape accusations are a threat of force, a threat to
get the power of the state to punish a man for doing what a woman
doesn’t like. The very real possibility that a woman can do this, and
get away with it, without being punished in any way, is an indication
that she has the present power to threaten force. Thus, if they know
what’s good for them, men had better not offend a woman, lest the woman
call out the cops, and get these same men thrown into jail based on
false rape accusations.
The same is true for claims of domestic violence. A woman, simply by
calling the police, can bring the force of the state down on the man
involved. Mandatory arrest laws require that the man be arrested. Never
mind whether or not there actually was any domestic violence, and never
mind who the perpetrator was. The power is held exclusively by the
female, and if the male does not do as she wishes, the man will be made
pay (if not financially, then certainly suffer via time in jail, being
forced to move out of his own house, inconvenience to his life via an
injunction, etc.).
A similar analysis applies to men who are behind in their
child-support payments. As perverse as it may seem, a significant number
of men who are behind in their child support payments are now thrown
into jail. In some cases, their professional licenses and driver’s
licenses are revoked. Never mind that these actions severely compromise
their ability to pay child support. Logic is not the dominant motivation
here. A display of power, and sending a strong message to men, that
women control the power, that is the primary message that is being sent.
And a showing of power is necessary as the first element of extortion.
Divorce-related child custody disputes provide another example. Women
can, and in many cases actually do, falsely accuse the men of abusing
their own children. The women, through these allegations, can cause men
to be estranged and separated from their own children. Of course there
are financial considerations here, such as the desire for more child
support. The greater the percentage of time that the mother has the
children, the more the child support will be. But taken from a wider
perspective, it appears as though there is also an important message
that is sent to men thereby, and that is that men had better comply with
not only the desires of women, but also the dictates of the legal
system.
You may ask “what about compassion for the fate of men?” There is
none of that here, we have a systematic extortion process underway,
where not only the woman gets money, but so do lawyers, psychologists,
child support collection clerks, etc. This is a systemic
government-supported racket with big money at stake. So forget about
compassion for men, the institutionalized incentive systems that are now
in place help to keep things the way they are.
The threat of force can also show up in allegations of sexual
harassment at work. Even if men go their own way, and have nothing to do
with women, they will in many cases be required to work with women. The
threat of a sexual harassment complaint, and the very real possibility
that the man could lose his job thereby, or have his reputation in an
industry thereby tarnished, is a very real and serious threat. What
about the prosecution of false accusers? Are you kidding? It’s just like
false rape accusations, false domestic abuse allegations, and false
child abuse allegations. The woman is virtually never prosecuted for her
vengeful and/or extortionate display of power exerted in an effort to
get the man to fork over the resources.
Many men ignorantly fail to see that they are living under a profound
and serious threat that force will be used against them. For years I
wondered why so many American men were acting like hopeless wimps when
interacting with their wives. I was dismayed to note how they refused to
stand-up for themselves, and refused to correct their wives when their
wives were obviously in the wrong. Now I get it — they had at least
unconsciously internalized the threat of force discussed here, and at
least on some level they fully understood what they were up against.
They dared not let people know they had any balls, that they might
actually be able to stand up and be counted. Most slaves threatened with
severe punishment do not generally stand-up for themselves.
Consider next the (2) future harm that a woman might do to a man. She
could have him thrown in jail, could get him to pay her outrageous
child support (entirely unrelated to actual child support needs), could
get him to pay for another man’s child (paternity fraud), or could get
him to pay lifelong or at least long-term alimony. She could force him
to attend “anger management” classes (state-sponsored brainwashing as I
see it). She could get him thrown in jail on criminal charges like rape,
child abuse, stalking, or domestic violence. These future harms are
exercised regularly, and both men and women are fully aware of how much
more harsh the criminal justice system’s punishments are for men than
they are for women. For example, as Bill Price has recently reported,
American men are executed about 100 times more often then women. [Note
1]
The next element is the (3) money or resources obtained thereby. Most
young women I know don’t want to be some high-powered corporate
executive, or for that matter any other type of wage earner. Instead
they want to stay home and have kids, and they want a man to make that
possible by paying for her to live that lifestyle. On a basic level, it
makes sense that women would want a man to provide resources so that her
offspring can do well, but this fundamental old-fashioned motivation
has been twisted for selfish monetary purposes, twisted to the point
where it is no longer recognizable. The extortionate and forced transfer
of money and resources from men to women is now at the expense of (a)
male freedom, (b) male self-determination, and (c) basic human decency.
The fact that men are thrown in jail for not paying child support, in
many instances for not paying money they don’t have, that shows that
this is not a system based on either a man’s ability to pay, or a policy
intended to promote harmonious family arrangements. Thanks to misguided
chivalry, the strident and ceaseless complaints of feminists, the
compliant white-knight politicians who respond to the feminist demands,
and the widespread greed of women, America’s legal system now provides
for the institutionalized extraction of money and resources from
heterosexual men.
Notice that this extraction (4) comes only from heterosexual men.
These men are the sole target of the extraction process. Women, by and
large, do not pay alimony, and they do not pay child support. Women do
not, by and large, go to jail for domestic violence, stalking, or rape.
Women are not generally accused of, nor do they generally lose jobs
because of sexual harassment accusations. The heavy-duty punishments,
directed at heterosexual men, are intended to make men pay. It’s as
simple as that.
So, for example, if you never wanted a child with a particular woman
who “got pregnant,” and you objected to becoming a father, it doesn’t
matter. So what if she lied abut being on birth control? The woman is
nonetheless supported by the legal system in collecting child support
from you. Never mind that she can unilaterally get an abortion, or put
the baby up for adoption, both without your permission. Nobody said this
was fair. And let’s give up the myth that it’s about supporting
children. That’s just the excuse used to legitimize the extortion. For
example, a good number of men, who have proven with DNA evidence that
they are not the fathers of certain children, are nonetheless forced by
the courts to pay child support. [Note 2] You, the man, are going to be
made to pay anyway. The man has absolutely no say in the matter.
Which brings us to the place where there is an (5) intention to steal
behind all this. At some point in the past, I imagine some men and
women, with good intentions, wanted to enter a partnership where they
both contributed to raising a family. More recently in history, men got a
job, and women stayed home and took care of the kids. That separation
of duties may have made some sense in 1950, but it no longer does. While
men are legally obliged to keep being the providers, women are no
longer required live up to their side of the bargain. Instead, men are
legally required to support women in their efforts to do whatever the
hell they want with their lives (via tax dollars at the very least, for
example having children on their own without any involvement of a man).
The current arrangement is way beyond a lopsided allocation of
gender-based financial responsibility, it is now outright extortion of
heterosexual men. Under the current system, no matter what the woman
does, men are forced to pay.
The Twisting Of Natural Impulses: It is natural, and I believe on
some deeper level innate in heterosexual men, to want to give and
support women and the family. But the current legal system has gone way
beyond the desire to give and support. It has used that inclination,
that desire, that deeper urge, and twisted it into something so
draconian and oppressive, that for an increasing number of men who
dispassionately and clearly see what is happening, all desire to give to
a woman or “her” offspring (as she often puts it) evaporates.
A desire to give to the family, in mutuality, as a matter of choice,
as a contribution to the welfare of the family — that could be a
wonderful thing. But when this giving becomes a slavery-like
institution, as it now has become in America, men are increasingly
abandoning it, and with good reason. The statistics indicate what’s
happening, and the laments from the women of child-bearing age, such as
“where have all the good men gone?” are just another indication of the
male abandonment of the family that’s now underway. Marriage rates in
the USA in 2009 were 6.8 per 1000 people. This rate has steadily
declined since 1970, at which point it was 10.6 per 1000 people. Note
that 1970 was around the time when feminist lies and propaganda became
well-entrenched in the American legal system. [Note 3]
In this case, the “good men,” as the women refer to them, are the men
who are willing to put themselves in the saddle of husband and
provider, with all the legal fetters that go along with that. There are
still some brave (“ignorant” might be a better term) men who are willing
to put themselves, their assets, their careers, and their reputations,
at great risk, in the statistically unreasonable hope that the women
they chose won’t call out the sheriff and have them manacled and bound
into some sort of an institutionalized payment arrangement (divorce
asset splits, alimony, and child support are the most widely employed
mechanisms). These “good men” desperately need to get the message
discussed herein.
It is perverse that the most illogical and primitive part of man, his
innate desire for sex, partnership, and love with a woman, is used for,
and played upon to effect, this institutionalized extortion. Men have
historically been driven by instinct and hormones in this place, but
they desperately now need to use their logical brains to understand what
is really happening. So long as men don’t use a detached, rational, and
objective perspective to see the institutionalized extortion that’s
underway, they will continue to fall prey to the ploys of women
surrounding marriage and children.
Institutionalized Abuse: Feminism has brought with it the illogical
notion that women can do no harm, and when this myth is combined with
nearly unchecked power, abuse will be the result. We see this same
result in many areas, not just the institutionalized extortion of
resources from men as discussed above. Consider a 2010 US Department of
Justice study that examined the sexual abuse of teenagers in detention
(juvenile halls, group homes, etc.) [Note 4]. This study surveyed 8,700
juveniles housed in 326 facilities, representing about 25% of the
nation’s youth living in such detention facilities. Among the 10% of
youths who admitted to being sexually abused, 92% said the abuse was
perpetrated by females. That’s not a typo — that’s 92%.
Lovisa Stannow, the executive director of California-based non-profit
Just Detention International, which advocates for the elimination of
prison rape, had a very insightful comment about this same study. She
said, “When you have an extreme power differential and absolute
unchecked power, bad things start happening. When you combine this with a
culture where sex abuse by females on males isn’t taken seriously, then
you have the perfect set-up for women with all this power to get away
with it.”
The same conclusion applies to the institutionalized extortion of
resources by women from heterosexual men. It’s about time that more of
us American men honestly acknowledged what’s happening to us. It’s about
time that we older American men started honestly and fully informing
the younger American men what the deal is with women and the legal
system. We older men need to do this informing before it is too late —
that is before the younger men get married, get a woman pregnant, or
move in with a woman.
.jpg)
