Make A Choice American Men, Either Rise Up or Go Abroad!

The current groundswell of awareness among American men that feminism, the mainstream media, educational institutions, and American women have long conspired to keep men manipulated and under control is encouraging.  However, what is the next step to righting the wrongs that are being exacted against men in legislatures, courtrooms, and workplaces across the country?  There are two options aware men should consider, hastening the collapse and rebuild, or going abroad to opt out of the society.

The election of Donald Trump was the shot across the bow for gynocentric America, but it is a day late and a dollar short.  President Trump could never achieve a complete reset of American society and culture without the assistance of collapse.  Perhaps this is why he is provoking North Korea, Turkey, and America's historic allies.  Whatever the case, he seems to be aware that only a catastrophic event can justify rebuilding the society in a way that avoids the mistakes of permitting women to vote, and immigrants to overrun this nation.

I, being a Man Going His Own Way (MGTOW), have seen the writing on the wall for decades so I have carved out an existence for myself abroad.  My ancestors came to America and I had the prerogative to leave it.  Don't be afraid to do the same because in this way, the gynocentric system of power will starve from a brain and wealth drain of its most able men abandoning ship.

But the important point is that American men MUST do something instead of sitting by idly and taking the losses by the day.  Do what you can to save yourself and restore the proper and natural balance of power between men and women without state interference.  It is not enough for America to proudly declare that it is still the greatest country in the world when it treats its men as second class citizens.  Do something to hasten the Great Reset or simply opt out of living in America to starve it of your talent and money.

Is Misogyny Justifed?

Misogyny can be defined as either the hatred of women OR the lack of trust of women. Feminists tend to view it as the former only when they attempt to shame rational men, but it more commonly is simple lack of trust.

I am a misogynist and without apology. However, I am very fond of certain women that I choose to have in my life. What gives?

We first must understand that at a very basic level, women are programmed by nature and social conditioning to dispossess men of resources in whatever way they can.

-Some women use wiles and attraction to prompt men to willingly use or give resources to women (ie marriage).

-Some women engage in "damseling" to ignite the rescuer impulse in men (I lost my cellphone on my date with you! Oh, honey let me buy you a brand new one!).

-Some women shame men into buying them drinks as a gauge for future resource grabs.

-Some women accept money or gifts for sex (prostitution and Sugar Baby activity).

-Some women befriend men at work so the willingly men take on the women's work for a fake hint of sexual favors later.

-Some women strategically pull legal levers against men in the form of fake or frivolous lawsuits to strong-arm monetary settlements or judgments from men (EEO complaints and divorce).

-Some women nag, stress-out, hen-peck their men into an early grave, or they procure the killings of their husbands for insurance money and resource grabs.

-Some women bat their eyelashes and repeat how much they like something to trigger the, "Let me get that for your dear" impulse in men.

You get the point......

Women, with the aid of the state and other men, want what you have to offer. And some will use passive means to get it and others more active means. This is their primal charge in life.

With this in mind, misogyny (in the context of lack of trust) is morally justified even in the face of feminist screams of, "You're a misogynist pig who hates women!" which is nothing but an attempt to put you on the defensive and prove otherwise to gain female approval/potential sexual access.

This is not to deny the existence of exceptional women who have the intellect and grit to override this female imperative, but as we know exceptions cannot disprove what is generally true.

The man who generally "trusts" women, is either a fool or a future man-slave in the making.

If you are not a misogynist (in the lack of trust sense), you had better be one soon before you are eventually duped like most men.

Read more about this in Esther Vilar's groundbreaking book, "The Manipulated Man." It will change your life.

Banning Islam Is The Only Solution

Modern life in the West now includes the ever present threat of Islamic attacks.  Although Islam, as a quasi-religion, enjoys protections under the guise of religion, it is an ideology pure and simple.  Nazism and Communism never enjoyed the unfettered and unassailable existence that Islam currently does.  That is why a new paradigm is needed: The banning of Islam from the West.

Currently political leadership in the West, with the exception of President Trump, are not yet able to get their minds around the only solution to Islamic terror wreaking havoc in polite society.  So this will be a long and painful process.  As more and more carnage piles up in the streets of the West, people will become more and more angry with the lack of effective action on the part of their leaders.  They will vote out the Angela Merkels and Emmanuel Macron's for pragmatic leaders who will wage effective wars against the Islamic incursion.

One country will have to take the lead and simply ban Islam and the rest will follow.  This ban of Islam will likely come from an Eastern European nation like Czech Republic or Hungary and this will set off a cascading trend among other Western nations.  The major Western powers will be the last to make these changes due to their tendancy towards politically correct brainwashing, but the changes will occur.

Predictably , this will set off a massive explosion of violence in societies with significant Islamic populations and wars of Islamic purging will be the result.

The problem of Islamic terrorism is but the latest offensive of the Neo-Ottoman's who want to retake the world.  They failed in the past and they will likely fail again, but the West needs to prepare itself for the fight that is coming.  That means:

-Acknowledging Islam as an existential threat.
-Banning additional Muslims from immigrating into the West.
-Banning Islamic activity as national security threats.
-Neutralizing recalcitrants Islamists in the West.
-Requiring Westernization of all Muslims as a requirement for residence in the West.

Buckle yourselves in folks, the process will be bloody, protracted, and fierce, but it will take place and the West is very likely to prevail.

Spread the word: Ban Islam in the West and banish all Muslims from the West!  Our survival depends upon it.

I'm Baaaaaaack!

To All My Readers:

My apologies for not posting on this blog for so long.  At the time the blog was active, I held a sensitive government position.  BUT NOW I'M RETIRED!!!!

I plan on posting here periodically again because the things I predicted several years ago are coming to fruition.

I hope you all are doing well and continuously preparing for the Decline in America.

Is Syria Putting Us On the Verge of World War III?

The Obama administration has announced that airstrikes on Syria are a possibility.  In case that does not strike you as troublesome, consider the implications that such simple "airstrikes" could be the shot across the bow that triggers WWIII.

In case you were not aware, Russia prefers to keep the Assad Regime in place for reasons that range from financial to the fear of the alternative.  Iran has also pledged to defend Assad at all costs.  So if you think the possibility of Russia and Iran against the US, Israel, and a few other nations constitutes a good bet, think again.

Obama is being cajoled by his new feminist UN Ambassador Samantha Power and his new feminist National Security Adviser Susan Rice who, ironically, never had to risk life and limb in combat due to their status as females.  Nonetheless, these two might just succeed in convincing the President to spark World War III.

With the economic doldrums weighing down the US, a world war might prove to be the undoing of this nation.  Domestic strife would ensue and the US would suffer the same fate as the former Soviet Union, death by imperial and military debt.  Russia has bounced back nicely given the autocratic pragmatism of Putin, but the US could not given our democratic gridlock and corporate supremacy in politics.

Our forefathers specifically warned us against the dangers of "foreign entanglements" yet we find a way to fall into these quagmires again and again and again.

Stay tuned for how this all plays out.

Americans Renoucing Citizenship In Record Numbers

Wall Street Journal Article

The number of U.S. taxpayers renouncing citizenship or permanent-resident status surged to a record high in the second quarter, as new laws aimed at cracking down on overseas assets increase the cost of complying and the risk of a taxpayer misstep.

A total of 1,130 names appeared on the latest list of renunciations from the Internal Revenue Service, according to Andrew Mitchel, a tax lawyer in Centerbrook, Conn., who tracks the data. That is far above the previous high of 679, set in the first quarter, and more than were reported in all of 2012.

Taxpayers aren't required to explain the move, but experts said the recent rise is likely due to tougher laws and enforcement  "The IRS crackdown on U.S. taxpayers living abroad seems to be having an effect," said Mr. Mitchel. The IRS declined comment. Lags in reporting renunciations might mean that many who appeared on the current list made the move months earlier. Taxpayers who renounced can be subject to an exit tax, and people who renounced last year may have avoided higher taxes on capital gains and income that went into effect in 2013.

 

The U.S. is rare in that all income earned by citizens and permanent residents, even those living abroad, can be subject to U.S. tax, according to Bryan Skarlatos, a New York lawyer. The U.S. also confers citizenship on people who are born on American soil.

The U.S. launched the tax crackdown after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and ratcheted up its efforts after 2009, amid evidence that UBS AG UBSN.VX 0.00% and other foreign institutions helped U.S. taxpayers hide assets.  Some taxpayers have applied for IRS limited-amnesty programs, in which they pay stiff penalties for past noncompliance but avoid prosecution.  Tax lawyers say the crackdown has ensnared smaller violators who weren't intentionally evading U.S. taxes. In addition, a law enacted in 2010, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or Fatca, requires foreign financial institutions to certify they aren't hiding U.S. taxpayer assets, which lawyers say is leading some to reject U.S. customers.
Taxpayer penalties for failing to report assets can be severe, including up to 50% of an account balance for each year.

The web of rules is "overly burdensome," said Jeffrey Neiman, a former federal prosecutor who led the 2009 UBS case, which resulted in the bank's agreeing to a $780 million settlement. He now is a lawyer in private practice in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. "You basically find yourself in this continuous nightmare."
The cost of complying with various rules and regulations can be steep even for people with small tax bills.
Carol Tapanila, who moved to Canada more than 40 years ago and is now retired, renounced her citizenship in November and appeared on the current list. She says her U.S. taxes amounted to about $250 last year and she didn't take the step to avoid paying them.  Legal and accounting fees and other costs of making sure she was in compliance in recent years have added up to nearly $40,000, says Ms. Tapanila. "It is nothing but stress."

Expatriation can also be costly, requiring that taxpayers prove they have properly paid five years' taxes, among other things.

America, We're Number 27!